HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS MATHEMATICS LESSONS USING THE PQ4R STRATEGY AND PROBLEM POSING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to examine students 'attitudes or perceptions of mathematics learning, attitudes towards the Application of PQ4R (Preview, Question, Read, Reflection, Recite, Review) Learning Strategies, and problem posing mathematical problems. Data were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive data analysis, and quantitative analysis was carried out using the Likert scale. The population in this study were Year 11 students in the city of Bandung, and the sample was one of Year 11 Social classroom as the experimental class, selected by purposive sampling. The sample was given treatment using PQ4R learning. The results showed that students taking PQ4R learning had significant attitudes towards mathematics. This can be seen from the high interest and motivation. Student responses to PQ4R learning and questions were also very good. This provides good information about students' attitudes towards learning mathematics in high school so that they can apply good and correct mathematics. Learning mathematics requires an analysis of students' attitudes to feel happy and motivated in learning mathematics on an ongoing basis.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article Details
How to Cite
Dahlan, T., Darhim, D., Juandi, D., Gardenia, N., & Kandaga, T. (2021). HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES TOWARDS MATHEMATICS LESSONS USING THE PQ4R STRATEGY AND PROBLEM POSING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol6no2.2021pp171-180
Section
Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Authors are asked to sign a "Copyright Transfer Agreement" upon acceptance of their manuscript, before the manuscript can be published. After the agreement is signed, copyright on the manuscript is transferred to the publisher (FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA), and the Authors grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or the Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.
References
Dahlan, T. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Tam Assisted Idividualization dan Jigsaw Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Siswa MTS Pada Pokok Bahsan Relasi dan Fungsi. Symmetry: Pasundan Journal of Research in Mathematics Learning and Education, I(1), 29–38. Retrieved from https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/symmetry/article/view/217/90
English, L. D. (1998). Children’s Problem Posing within Formal and Informal Contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83–106. Retrieved from https://pubs.nctm.org/view/journals/jrme/29/1/article-p83.xml
Gardenia, N., Herman, T., & Dahlan, T. (2019). PQ4R Strategy (Preview, Question, Read, Reflection, Recite, Review) for Mathematical Communication Ability. Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2018), 253(Aes 2018), 322–327. https://doi.org/10.2991/aes-18.2019.75
Greenhalgh, L. Z., & Rosenblatt. (2018). Job insecurity: Towards Conceptual Clarity.
Gazali, R. Y. (2016). Pembelajaran Matematika Yang Bermakna. Math Didactic, 2(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v2i3.47
Jatisunda, M. G., & Nahdi, D. S. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Scaffolding. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.2042
Kandaga, T., Dahlan, T., Gardenia, N., Darta, & Saputra, J. (2021). A lesson study to foster prospective teachers’ disposition in STEM education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012107
Noviani, J. (2021). Perceptions of Mathematics Education Students Toward E-Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol6no1.2021pp15-30
Pourdavood, B. R. G., & Wachira, P. (2016). Importance of Mathematical Communication and Discourse in Secondary Classrooms. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 15(10), 1–13. Retrieved from https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume15/2-Importance-of-Mathematical.pdf
Rahayu, W., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Istiandaru, A. (2021). The Innovative Learning of Social Arithmetic using Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i1.2676
Septi, D., & Afifah, N. (2015). Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika (JP2M), 1(2), 100–111. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stkippgritulungagung.ac.id/index.php/jp2m/article/view/198/81
Sipayung, T. N., Imelda, Siswono, T. Y. E., & Masriyah. (2021). The preliminary study of students’ creative problem-solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1836(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012052
Siregar, N. R. (2017). Persepsi Siswa Pada Pelajaran Matematika: Studi Pendahuluan Pada Siswa yang Menyenangi Game. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah X Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia, 1, 224–232. Retrieved from jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ippi/article/view/2193
Sugiyono. (2015). Penelitian & Pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukma, Y., & Priatna, N. (2021). Mathematics Teachers’ Response To Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol6no1.2021pp1-14
Suprijono, A. (2016). Model-model pembelajaran emansipatoris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Trianto. (2011). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep Strategi Dan Implementasinya Dalam Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Widyantari, N. K. S., Suardana, I. N., & Devi, N. L. P. L. (2019). Pengaruh Strategi Belajar Kognitif, Metakognitif Dan Sosial Afektif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia (JPPSI), 2(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsi.v2i2.19384
English, L. D. (1998). Children’s Problem Posing within Formal and Informal Contexts. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 83–106. Retrieved from https://pubs.nctm.org/view/journals/jrme/29/1/article-p83.xml
Gardenia, N., Herman, T., & Dahlan, T. (2019). PQ4R Strategy (Preview, Question, Read, Reflection, Recite, Review) for Mathematical Communication Ability. Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Education Symposium (AES 2018), 253(Aes 2018), 322–327. https://doi.org/10.2991/aes-18.2019.75
Greenhalgh, L. Z., & Rosenblatt. (2018). Job insecurity: Towards Conceptual Clarity.
Gazali, R. Y. (2016). Pembelajaran Matematika Yang Bermakna. Math Didactic, 2(3), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v2i3.47
Jatisunda, M. G., & Nahdi, D. S. (2020). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dengan Scaffolding. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.2042
Kandaga, T., Dahlan, T., Gardenia, N., Darta, & Saputra, J. (2021). A lesson study to foster prospective teachers’ disposition in STEM education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012107
Noviani, J. (2021). Perceptions of Mathematics Education Students Toward E-Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol6no1.2021pp15-30
Pourdavood, B. R. G., & Wachira, P. (2016). Importance of Mathematical Communication and Discourse in Secondary Classrooms. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: Mathematics and Decision Sciences, 15(10), 1–13. Retrieved from https://globaljournals.org/GJSFR_Volume15/2-Importance-of-Mathematical.pdf
Rahayu, W., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Istiandaru, A. (2021). The Innovative Learning of Social Arithmetic using Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. Jurnal Elemen, 7(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v7i1.2676
Septi, D., & Afifah, N. (2015). Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika (JP2M), 1(2), 100–111. Retrieved from https://jurnal.stkippgritulungagung.ac.id/index.php/jp2m/article/view/198/81
Sipayung, T. N., Imelda, Siswono, T. Y. E., & Masriyah. (2021). The preliminary study of students’ creative problem-solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1836(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012052
Siregar, N. R. (2017). Persepsi Siswa Pada Pelajaran Matematika: Studi Pendahuluan Pada Siswa yang Menyenangi Game. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah X Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia, 1, 224–232. Retrieved from jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ippi/article/view/2193
Sugiyono. (2015). Penelitian & Pengembangan (Research and Development/R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukma, Y., & Priatna, N. (2021). Mathematics Teachers’ Response To Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Opportunities. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.22236/kalamatika.vol6no1.2021pp1-14
Suprijono, A. (2016). Model-model pembelajaran emansipatoris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Trianto. (2011). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu Konsep Strategi Dan Implementasinya Dalam Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Widyantari, N. K. S., Suardana, I. N., & Devi, N. L. P. L. (2019). Pengaruh Strategi Belajar Kognitif, Metakognitif Dan Sosial Afektif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Sains Indonesia (JPPSI), 2(2), 151. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsi.v2i2.19384