PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR MATERI INDUKSI MATEMATIKA DAN TEORI BINOMIAL BERBASIS PEMBUKTIAN
Main Article Content
Abstract
Students' ability in solving argumentation in mathematical induction and binomial theory is still lacking based on the results of the exam, so that evidence-based teaching materials are prepared. This study uses design research methods with the subject from 2nd semester students of the Mathematics Education Study Program. This research is a development research consisting of 6 stages: Identification of needs, Planning, Initial product development, Initial product testing, Product revision, Field trials so as to produce teaching materials. The results of the lecturer and student validation show that the teaching materials are valid and feasible to use with an average score of 45 and 45,9333. While the test of the effectiveness of teaching materials used using the t-test obtained results that ttest> ttable, 5.83 > 2.11 which means there is an increase in the average value of students before and after using teaching materials. With the increase in value, it indicates that the instructional materials prepared are effectively used.
Article Details
How to Cite
Nurafni, N., Miatun, A., Khusna, H., & Jusra, H. (2019). PENGEMBANGAN BAHAN AJAR MATERI INDUKSI MATEMATIKA DAN TEORI BINOMIAL BERBASIS PEMBUKTIAN. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol4no1.2019pp89-108
Section
Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.
References
Amri, S. & Ahmadi, K. I. (2010). Proses Pembelajaran Kreatif dan Inovatif di dalam Kelas. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Karya.
Arnawa, I. M. (2007). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam Memvalidasi Bukti pada Aljabar Abstrak melalui Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Teori APOS. Jurnal Matematika dan Sains, 14(2), 64.
Ashkenazi, Y. & Itzkovitch, E. (2014). Proof by Mathematical Induction. International Journal of Innovative and Reasearch in Educational Science, 1(3), 186 – 190.
Hine, G. (2017). Proof by Mathematical Induction: Professional Practice for Secondary Teachers. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Biennial Conference, Australian Capital Territory, Canberra.
Imamah, E. Q., Lestari, U. & Gofur, A. (2016). Pengembangan Booklet dari Penelitian Pengaruh Tahu Berformalin terhadap Histopatologi Hati Mencit Jantan Galur Balb/C untuk Masyaraka Kota Kediri. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 2(2), 102-108.
Juandi, D. (2008). Pembuktian, Penalaran, dan Komunikasi Matematika. Bandung: FMIPA-UPI.
Koparan, T. (2017). Analysis of Teaching Materials Developed by Prospective Mathematics Teachers and Their Views on Material Development. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4).
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standar for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Raji, W. (2013). An Introductory Course in Elementary Number Theory. The Saylor Foundation.
Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical design research (DDR) dalam pengembangan pembelajaran matematika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (pp. 3-12).
Vincent, J., Chick, H., & McCrae, B. (2005). Argumentation Profile Charts as Tools for Analysing Students’argumentations. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 281.
Yudi, M., Ariani, N. M., & Ramadianti, W. (2017). Desain Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Aljabar Linear untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Matematis. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1-14.
Arnawa, I. M. (2007). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam Memvalidasi Bukti pada Aljabar Abstrak melalui Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Teori APOS. Jurnal Matematika dan Sains, 14(2), 64.
Ashkenazi, Y. & Itzkovitch, E. (2014). Proof by Mathematical Induction. International Journal of Innovative and Reasearch in Educational Science, 1(3), 186 – 190.
Hine, G. (2017). Proof by Mathematical Induction: Professional Practice for Secondary Teachers. Paper presented at the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers Biennial Conference, Australian Capital Territory, Canberra.
Imamah, E. Q., Lestari, U. & Gofur, A. (2016). Pengembangan Booklet dari Penelitian Pengaruh Tahu Berformalin terhadap Histopatologi Hati Mencit Jantan Galur Balb/C untuk Masyaraka Kota Kediri. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 2(2), 102-108.
Juandi, D. (2008). Pembuktian, Penalaran, dan Komunikasi Matematika. Bandung: FMIPA-UPI.
Koparan, T. (2017). Analysis of Teaching Materials Developed by Prospective Mathematics Teachers and Their Views on Material Development. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4).
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standar for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Raji, W. (2013). An Introductory Course in Elementary Number Theory. The Saylor Foundation.
Suryadi, D. (2013). Didactical design research (DDR) dalam pengembangan pembelajaran matematika. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (pp. 3-12).
Vincent, J., Chick, H., & McCrae, B. (2005). Argumentation Profile Charts as Tools for Analysing Students’argumentations. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 281.
Yudi, M., Ariani, N. M., & Ramadianti, W. (2017). Desain Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Aljabar Linear untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berfikir Kreatif Matematis. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 1-14.