PENGARUH PENDEKATAN VISUAL THINKING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN KONEKSI MATEMATIS SISWA
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to see the effect of visual thinking approach on improving students' mathematical connection ability. This is a quasi-experimental research with nonequivalent control group design. The sample is students on class VIII in Madrasah Tsanawiyah which is chosen by using purposive sampling technique. The research instruments used are a test of mathematical connection ability and an observation sheet. The results of the observations showed an increase in the activity of students and teachers in each meeting in the classroom that obtained learning by using visual thinking approach. The data of increased connection ability is not normally distributed, so the data analysis is done using U non-parametric test of Mann Whitney. From the data analysis, it can be concluded that there is no significant effect of learning by using visual thinking approach to students’ mathematical connection ability improvement.
Article Details
How to Cite
Nurdin, E., Nufus, H., & Hasanuddin, H. (2018). PENGARUH PENDEKATAN VISUAL THINKING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN KONEKSI MATEMATIS SISWA. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol3no1.2018pp17-26
Section
Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.
References
Abdullah, N, Zakaria, E & Halim, L. (2012). The Effect of Thinking Strategy Approach through Visual Representation on Achievement and Conceptual Understanding in Solving Mathematical Word Problem. Asian Social Science, 8(16).
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2006). Panduan Pengembangan Silabus Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta : CV. Laksana Mandiri.
Bolton, S. (2011). Decoding Visual Thinking. Naver Workshop, Visualising Creative Strategies. (Online), (http://issuu.com/gpbr/docs/decodingvisualthinking).
Hake, R.R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. (Online), (http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/Analyzingchange-Gain.pdf).
IEA. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Result in Mathematics. (Online), (http://timss2015.org/wp-content/uploads/filebase/full%20pdfs/T15-International-Results-in-Mathematics-Grade-4.pdf).
Krulik, S & Posamentier, A. (2009). Problem Solving in Mathematics Grade 3-6. California: Corwin A SAGE Company.
Lane (1993). The Conceptual Framework for the Development of a Mathematics Performance Assessment Instrument. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. (Online), (http://web.njit.edu/~ronkowit/teaching/rubrics/samples/math_probsolv_chicago.pdf).
Makina, A. (2010). The Role of Visualisation in Develoving Critical Thinking in Mathematics. Perspectives in Education, 28(1).
Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible “Hidden Variable” in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Iowa: Department of Physics and Astronomy.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standard for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Novitasari, D. (2016). Pengaruh Penggunaan Multimedia Interaktif terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Fibonacci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 2(2), 8–18.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result in Focus. (Online), (http://www.pisa.oecd.org/).
Sagala, S. (2005). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berpikir dan Disposisi Matematik: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana Dikembangkan pada Peserta Didik. Makalah Tidak Diterbitkan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Surya, E. (2010). Visual Thinking dalam Memaksimalkan Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa dapat Membangun Karakter Bangsa. Jurnal Abmas, 10(10). (Online), (http://jurnal.upi.edu/abmas).
Thornton, S. (2001). A Picture is Worth A Thousand Words. (Online), (http://math.unipa.it/~grim/AThornton251.PDF).
Whardani, Sri & Rumiati. (2011). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika.
Widdiharto, R. (2008). Diagnosis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMP dan Alternatif Proses Remedinya. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK.
Wahyudin. (1999). Kemampuan Guru Matematika, Calon Guru Matematika dan Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Disertasi Tidak diterbitkan. Bandung. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Walker, C.M, Winner, L, Hetland, L, Simmons, S & Goldsmith, L. (2011). Visual Thinking: Art Students Have an Advantage in Geometry Reasoning. Creative Education, 2(1). DOI :10.4236/ce.2011.21004.
Yenni, Y. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Koneksi Matematis Siswa SMP. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 71-83.
Zahar, I. (2009). Belajar Matematikaku: Pembelajaran Matematika secara Visual dan Kinestetik. Jakarta : Elex Media Komputindo.
Zhukovskiy, V.I & Pivovarov, D.V. (2008). The Nature of Visual Thinking. Journal of Serebian Federal University. (Online), (http://journal.sfu-kras.ru/en/article/641/25).
Zhukovskiy, V.I & Pivovarov, D.V. (2009). European Journal of Natural History. Characteristics of Visual Thinking. (Online), (http://www.world-science.ru/euro/126-20480).
Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan. (2006). Panduan Pengembangan Silabus Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta : CV. Laksana Mandiri.
Bolton, S. (2011). Decoding Visual Thinking. Naver Workshop, Visualising Creative Strategies. (Online), (http://issuu.com/gpbr/docs/decodingvisualthinking).
Hake, R.R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. (Online), (http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/Analyzingchange-Gain.pdf).
IEA. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Result in Mathematics. (Online), (http://timss2015.org/wp-content/uploads/filebase/full%20pdfs/T15-International-Results-in-Mathematics-Grade-4.pdf).
Krulik, S & Posamentier, A. (2009). Problem Solving in Mathematics Grade 3-6. California: Corwin A SAGE Company.
Lane (1993). The Conceptual Framework for the Development of a Mathematics Performance Assessment Instrument. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. (Online), (http://web.njit.edu/~ronkowit/teaching/rubrics/samples/math_probsolv_chicago.pdf).
Makina, A. (2010). The Role of Visualisation in Develoving Critical Thinking in Mathematics. Perspectives in Education, 28(1).
Meltzer, D.E. (2002). The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A Possible “Hidden Variable” in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. Iowa: Department of Physics and Astronomy.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standard for School Mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Novitasari, D. (2016). Pengaruh Penggunaan Multimedia Interaktif terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa. Jurnal Fibonacci: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 2(2), 8–18.
OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Result in Focus. (Online), (http://www.pisa.oecd.org/).
Sagala, S. (2005). Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berpikir dan Disposisi Matematik: Apa, Mengapa dan Bagaimana Dikembangkan pada Peserta Didik. Makalah Tidak Diterbitkan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Surya, E. (2010). Visual Thinking dalam Memaksimalkan Pembelajaran Matematika Siswa dapat Membangun Karakter Bangsa. Jurnal Abmas, 10(10). (Online), (http://jurnal.upi.edu/abmas).
Thornton, S. (2001). A Picture is Worth A Thousand Words. (Online), (http://math.unipa.it/~grim/AThornton251.PDF).
Whardani, Sri & Rumiati. (2011). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP: Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Matematika.
Widdiharto, R. (2008). Diagnosis Kesulitan Belajar Siswa SMP dan Alternatif Proses Remedinya. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK.
Wahyudin. (1999). Kemampuan Guru Matematika, Calon Guru Matematika dan Siswa dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Disertasi Tidak diterbitkan. Bandung. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Walker, C.M, Winner, L, Hetland, L, Simmons, S & Goldsmith, L. (2011). Visual Thinking: Art Students Have an Advantage in Geometry Reasoning. Creative Education, 2(1). DOI :10.4236/ce.2011.21004.
Yenni, Y. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Koneksi Matematis Siswa SMP. KALAMATIKA Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 71-83.
Zahar, I. (2009). Belajar Matematikaku: Pembelajaran Matematika secara Visual dan Kinestetik. Jakarta : Elex Media Komputindo.
Zhukovskiy, V.I & Pivovarov, D.V. (2008). The Nature of Visual Thinking. Journal of Serebian Federal University. (Online), (http://journal.sfu-kras.ru/en/article/641/25).
Zhukovskiy, V.I & Pivovarov, D.V. (2009). European Journal of Natural History. Characteristics of Visual Thinking. (Online), (http://www.world-science.ru/euro/126-20480).