KEMAMPUAN ANALOGI MATEMATIS MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH KALKULUS DIFFERENSIAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to describe the students capability in mathematics analogy at the subject of differential calculus. The technique in taking the sample uses “purposive sampling technique”. It takes three students from each category, they are low, medium, and high. From the low category must of students haven’t understood get the concept used the solve the problem, not only the problem of the source but also the problem of target. For the medium category most of the students have understood the concept, and the similiar concept used, but they dont’t have the cabability to apply in solving the problem. Whereas for the high category most of the students have understood the similiar concept, the concept that is used and have capability to apply it to solve the problem of the source and target.
Article Details
How to Cite
Gunawan, G., & Subekti, F. E. (2018). KEMAMPUAN ANALOGI MATEMATIS MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH KALKULUS DIFFERENSIAL. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 223-238. https://doi.org/10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol3no2.2018pp223-238
Section
Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author is responsible for acquiring the permission(s) to reproduce any copyrighted figures, tables, data, or text that are being used in the submitted paper. Authors should note that text quotations of more than 250 words from a published or copyrighted work will require grant of permission from the original publisher to reprint. The written permission letter(s) must be submitted together with the manuscript.
References
English, L. D. (1993). Reasoning by Analogy in Constructing Mathematical Ideas. U.S.: Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).
Gentner, D. (2006). Analogical Reasoning, Psychology of. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. 106-112. DOI:10.1002/0470018860.s00473
Keane, M. T. (1996). Transfer Between Analogies: How Solving One Analogy Problem Helps to Solve Another. University of Dublin.
Meagher, D. (2006). Understanding Analogies: The Analogy Item Format and the Miller Analogies Test. PsychCorp.com.
Mofidi, S. Et al. (2012). Instruction of Mathematical Concepts Through Analogical Reasoning Skills. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(6).
Rahmawati, D.I. & Pala, R.H. (2017). Kemampuan Penalaran Analogi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Euclid, 4(2).
Santrock, J. W. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Penada Media Group.
Shadiq, F. (2009). Kemahiran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Sudarma, M. (2013). Logika Dasar: Tradisional, Simbolik dan Induktif. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suriasumantri, J. S. (1999). Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Gentner, D. (2006). Analogical Reasoning, Psychology of. Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. 106-112. DOI:10.1002/0470018860.s00473
Keane, M. T. (1996). Transfer Between Analogies: How Solving One Analogy Problem Helps to Solve Another. University of Dublin.
Meagher, D. (2006). Understanding Analogies: The Analogy Item Format and the Miller Analogies Test. PsychCorp.com.
Mofidi, S. Et al. (2012). Instruction of Mathematical Concepts Through Analogical Reasoning Skills. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 5(6).
Rahmawati, D.I. & Pala, R.H. (2017). Kemampuan Penalaran Analogi dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Euclid, 4(2).
Santrock, J. W. (2008). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Penada Media Group.
Shadiq, F. (2009). Kemahiran Matematika. Yogyakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Sudarma, M. (2013). Logika Dasar: Tradisional, Simbolik dan Induktif. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suriasumantri, J. S. (1999). Filsafat Ilmu Sebuah Pengantar Populer. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.